<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jones.  Bond Jones.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geebobg.com/2006/11/17/jones-bond-jones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geebobg.com/2006/11/17/jones-bond-jones/</link>
	<description>Americlecticintellectica</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gee bobg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Numerology</title>
		<link>http://www.geebobg.com/2006/11/17/jones-bond-jones/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>gee bobg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Numerology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphatic.com/bobg/wordpress/2006/11/17/jones-bond-jones/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>[...] A quick observation before heading to bed: this will be a good year because it ends in 007.  Bookmark to: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A quick observation before heading to bed: this will be a good year because it ends in 007.  Bookmark to: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gee bobg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Where next, Mr. Bond?</title>
		<link>http://www.geebobg.com/2006/11/17/jones-bond-jones/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>gee bobg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Where next, Mr. Bond?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emphatic.com/bobg/wordpress/2006/11/17/jones-bond-jones/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] The new Casino Royale is a great movie, not because it shows us how Bond became Bond per se, but because that story is a compelling one. As has been much remarked, this new film is a &#8220;bold departure&#8221; from the formula of the last four decades, including the entries in the Bond canon that were themselves supposed to be bold departures but weren&#8217;t, really (e.g., The Living Daylights). Mick LaSalle gets it right in his review for the SF Chronicle:  He&#8217;s a working-class guy who has made his way into upper-class circles but retains some residual coarseness that will never smooth out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The new Casino Royale is a great movie, not because it shows us how Bond became Bond per se, but because that story is a compelling one. As has been much remarked, this new film is a &#8220;bold departure&#8221; from the formula of the last four decades, including the entries in the Bond canon that were themselves supposed to be bold departures but weren&#8217;t, really (e.g., The Living Daylights). Mick LaSalle gets it right in his review for the SF Chronicle:  He&#8217;s a working-class guy who has made his way into upper-class circles but retains some residual coarseness that will never smooth out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
